Simmons, Rachel: Entry #4
Oh my Sydney !
When it
comes to philosophies I think that neither Martin nor Candide have a realistic
grasp on life and its meaning. Martin gives far too much credit to the works o evil
and the devil, while I think that man is just inherently corrupt. Candide I do
not agree with because not everything is for the best and being too optimistic
blinds people. The philosophy of optimism leads Candide to be taken advantage
of because he cannot see other’s selfishness and greed. So if I must pick one,
I will chose Martin for it is better to be doubtful and suspicious of everyone
then to be naïve and treated horribly. The happy medium between optimism and pessimism
is realism. My idea of realism is seeing what evils people are capable, but not
letting that keep you away from society. A realist takes precautions and waits
for someone to prove that they are trustworthy. Realism to me is the idea that it’s
only true if someone proves it to you. You have the option to prove to me that
you are mostly good or bad.
Finding
Cunegonde made me quite happy. The entire time I was waiting for doppy Candide
to find his woman. Cunegonde became a servant that washed dishes and had become
“horribly ugly” (103). This was the perfect test to see if Candide would stay
true to his lady and let love overcome outward appearances. Candide even
declared that it is his “duty to love her forever” (103) despite her newfound
ugliness. However, upon seeing her, he recoils in disgust. Later, he marries
her merely to spite her brother, the Barron, and because she kept pestering him
to do so. Do you think he still has love for her or did he just want to
complete his lifelong goal? Personally, I think Candide has been shallow from
the beginning and was just being a man of his word. However, I am not keen on
love and love stories so perhaps I see it all in a negative light because I am
biased.
The ending
to Candide was quite convenient. Pangloss and the Barron show up out of
nowhere. None of the main characters are actually dead, and they end up going
straight back to their old philosophy. It basically undoes all of Candide’s
experiences and discredits them. On the final page Pangloss says “all events
are interconnected in this best of all possible worlds, for if you hadn’t been
driven from a beautiful castle with hard kicks in the behind because of you
love for Lady Cunegonde, if you hadn’t wandered over America on foot, if you
hadn’t thrust your sword through the baron, and if you hadn’t lost all your
sheep form the land of El Dorado, you wouldn’t be here eating candied citrons
and pistachio nuts” (113). After all of Voltaire’s work creating horrible
situations and disproving the philosophy he has Candide fall right back into
it, only with more of a sense of fate. The quote puts so much faith into cause
and affect that it feels like one of those Direct TV commercials (“when your
cable company keeps you on hold, you get angry; when you get angry, you go blow
off steam…you wake up in a roadside ditch”). Candide just accepts that
everything happened for the best because the universe or fate wanted them to be
together. Were you satisfied with the ending? I thought it was ironic and
frustrating, but necessary since Pangloss came back. After all they had been
through tending a garden until death seems rather anti-climatic.
No comments:
Post a Comment